Building on how findings become evidence? Start with How ACAS Findings Become Remediation Evidence. Most people who have worked an ACAS scan or a STIG checklist have watched a finding turn into a POA&M item without ever seeing the step that got it there. The finding shows up red in a report, and a few days later there is a line item in eMASS with a control number attached to it. Nobody walks through how that connection actually got made. ...
New to how Splunk fits into compliance work? Start with How Splunk Supports Cybersecurity Evidence. Most people in federal IT have written “continuous monitoring” into a security plan before they have actually built anything that monitors continuously. So what turns a ConMon strategy from a paragraph in a document into something an assessor can verify, and what does Splunk actually need to be doing for that to hold up? The Gap Between the Policy and the Platform NIST SP 800-137 describes an Information Security Continuous Monitoring program as an ongoing awareness of risk, vulnerabilities, and threats. DoDI 8510.01 expects that awareness to feed the authorization decision on a continuing basis, not just at the three-year reassessment. The document usually gets written first. The searches that are supposed to produce that awareness get written later, if at all, and often only after an assessor asks to see one running. ...
New to RMF? Start with What Is RMF? A Practical Introduction for SysAdmins. Most people working in federal IT environments have pulled an ACAS report before they understood what that report was actually supposed to prove. The scan runs, Tenable.sc produces a list of findings sorted by severity, and somewhere in the process that output is supposed to turn into evidence that satisfies an AO. What nobody explains upfront is what happens between the scan finishing and a finding being considered remediated inside the RMF package. ...
New to RMF? Start with What Is RMF? A Practical Introduction for SysAdmins. Most people working in federal IT have heard the term POA&M before they ever build one. It comes up during ATO pushes, shows up in ISSO job descriptions, and gets referenced in assessment reviews like everyone already knows what it means. What doesn’t get explained clearly is what a POA&M actually does – not as a concept, but as a compliance artifact that directly influences whether an Authorizing Official trusts your system enough to authorize it. ...
New to RMF? Start with What Is RMF? A Practical Introduction for SysAdmins. Most people who work in federal IT have heard of eMASS before they ever log into it. It comes up in job postings, in ATO conversations, in ISSO onboarding checklists. It has a reputation for being dense, unintuitive, and unforgiving if you don’t already know what you’re doing. That reputation isn’t entirely wrong. But eMASS isn’t a mystery — it’s a workflow tool. Once you understand what it’s actually doing and why it exists, the interface stops feeling like a maze and starts making a specific kind of sense. ...
The Question Nobody Answers Directly At some point in your federal IT career, someone mentions RMF. Maybe it comes up in a meeting. Maybe you see it on a job posting. Maybe your ISSO asks for documentation you didn’t know you were supposed to keep. And if you’re a SysAdmin, something unexpected happens when you actually dig into it. The steps start making sense. The controls often map to things you already configure. The evidence they’re asking for looks a lot like documentation you probably should have been keeping anyway. You think: I actually get this. I kind of like digging into a system like this. ...